In Zen’s absence, I’ve taken to wearing lots of rings. Not “a lot,” that indefinite but terminable and conclusive number, but “lots,” many lots, a few rings and then some. Right now, I am wearing fourteen rings– not the stackable, simple bands frequently employed by twelve-year-olds discovering jelly multipacks or mood rings, but large, dangerous, gaudy pieces.
On my left hand: An intricate inch and a half of bronze lace, circular and then curved around until the farthest points on either end of the circle meet and join to form the ring. It looks something like a lace cookie turned into a Pringle, and some of the intersections of lines of bronze have small, perfectly spherical stones set in. They’re blue, orange, and white. The whole ring glows under black light.
A locket, silver, an inch and a quarter in diameter, with a thin band to make it a ring. The band cuts into the crease of my finger and palm, but I wear it anyway. Someday, I’ll probably have something to put there; in the meantime, I must resist the overwhelming urge to use it to store drugs.
If one is to go by size, gaudiness, or ambiguous tacky elegance, this is by far the most of all of the rings. It’s not the most anything– well, it is; it’s the largest, the most potentially offensive with its antiqued bronze setting for an enormous matte black stone used as the backdrop for, not an inlay, but an entirely separate piece of stonework using yellow and black pieces ringed with more bronze to embellish a vintage rose teardrop whose color vaguely resembles oxidizing flesh– as much as it is the MOST. The most is what it is. It has the undeniable quality of being the most, radiating mostness and a kind of dusky brashness. The band is very heavily embossed, and I am reasonably sure that, if my adjacent fingers were not already armored, they would be rubbed raw by its very presence and rendered bloody by the twitching of unadorned fingers.
A narrow ring, long and elegant, beaten silver set with a red stone painted to look like an eye of sorts. Indian, almost. I could see this on the much smaller hand of a much smaller, darker girl, but I like the way I can wear it alone, if I want to, the way it makes my entire hand feel covered, shielded.
On my thumb, a ring much like the red one. Longer, though, the stone in this one three times as large, protruding. It’s smooth, polished, clear, and on the underside, it’s been painted a shimmering, almost cosmological blue. I can see an entire universe in this ring.
Underneath the blue ring, closer to the joint that ends my thumb and begins my hand, or my wrist, is a black and silver band engraved with incredibly Catholic crosses. It’s the kind of jewelry, I think, that the aggressively loyal twenty-two-year-old family man would wear, alone, on the ring finger of his right hand.
On my right hand: A delicate silver treble clef with an even more delicate band. I wear it on my smallest finger; for the longest time, that was the only finger that could fit.
Above the treble clef, away from my palm, a gold band split at a single point, each end set with an enormous rhinestone and then bent so that, instead of connecting directly, the rhinestones stack next to one another. One is pink, the other clear. It is by far my tackiest ring, and the only one whose tackiness fails to be at all endearing.
The smallest ring, a painfully wiry band set with a tiny garnet, edged with two even smaller silver beaten leaves. I don’t know what it’s supposed to be– a flower, perhaps? If the garnet were engraved to be a rose, it would make sense. For now, it’s just elegant.
Above that, a silver pentagram surrounded by Celtic knotwork.
A pair of bronze wings, each an inch long, protruding outwards in a delicate arch. I have fallen and landed on my fist– or, rather, having made a fist, landed on the tips of the wing, my entire weight set violently upon this relatively tiny object– and recovered not only gracefully but painlessly.
Above the wings, a thick titanium ring that doubles as a bottle opener.
A green robot with a black bow and painted black heart.
On my right thumb, a band made entirely out of tiny silver skulls.
Underneath that, closest to me, a silver braided band.
I like the idea that anyone else would find these things cumbersome, would be rendered useless by the sheer weight of the material burden on their manual dexterity. I like the idea that, out of chaos, I have created a collection that finds itself to be both bizarrely cohesive and perfectly composed.
With these rings, I have made myself spectacularly decorative, gaudy and trashy and ornamental and beautiful. I have also made myself dangerous, useful. I can open bottles, support my entire weight, hide anything, smash windows and faces and walls, protect my most dextrous of appendages with these rings.
But then, I don’t need these things because of Zen’s absence. I need them because of the presence of my parents this summer, and their weaponized, barely civilized domesticity. Because, if I do not wear them, I will have to defend myself with far more valuable things.
In a marriage, a ring is a promise of commitment, of love. It’s an investment in the idea that no problem will be so great that it will be worth giving up that ring. It’s a material representation of the belief that the future is worth preparing for. And it’s something that only humans do; all the other animals just approach the future realistically, or give practical gifts like dung balls or animal carcasses.
I have prepared for my future, and that is why, each time I visit my parents, I wear my rings, carry my knives. Not because I will use them– the knives are concealed, the rings only a threat to those already planning violence– but because if I don’t, I’ll spend every night locked in a dark room, venturing out only at night, dreading the creak of staircase footfalls like a small, scared animal. With these rings, I can maintain my humanity.